Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Keep the Liberal flame alive


A great Australian and a great Liberal laments the conservative take-over of the modern Liberal party and determines to stay in the party to support those who maintain that liberalism is the political philosophy best expressed to appeal to the aspirations of all Australians whilst building a compassionate, understanding and accepting society. (See eCouncillor earlier blog on an Australian Bill of Rights launched by Fraser at Sydney Town Hall).

Picture SMH - She won't be right Â… Malcolm Fraser yesterday.Photo: Jesse Marlow
Why I thought of quitting Libs

By Michael Gordon and Louise DodsonNovember 30, 2005

MALCOLM FRASER has considered quitting the Liberal Party after more than 50 years' membership, saying it has become "a party of fear and reaction".
The former prime minister said last night he had decided to remain a member to support those who were seeking to "keep the Liberal flame alive" and to encourage others to pursue change from within.
Delivering the chancellor's human rights lecture at the University of Melbourne, Mr Fraser said he found his party "unrecognisable as liberal" and alien to the principles of its founder, Robert Menzies. On the night the Government's anti-terrorist laws passed the House of Representatives, Mr Fraser singled them out, saying the legislation was wrong because "it makes the fundamental assumption that liberty cannot defend itself".
"The reason I considered [resignation] seriously is because I believe this is not just another piece of policy with which one doesn't agree," he said.
"Over several years there has been a fundamental departure from the basic idea of liberalism as I understood it. What I want to do is emphasise in the strongest possible way how serious this is, how people should not just let it fly over the shoulder and say 'She'll be right'."
Insisting it would be a long, hard task to achieve change, Mr Fraser said: "It might not be the next government. It might be the government after that. But there ought to be objectives to restore basic liberties and restore a true sense of the rule of law."
Mr Fraser joined the Liberal Party in the early 1950s. In the lecture, he said the Government's handling of the Tampa episode in 2001 marked "the effective end of the liberal age and the beginning of the period of regression".
The Government had failed to make a case for the new terrorism laws and any claim to be taken on trust had been destroyed, Mr Fraser said.
"The fact that the Government, with the support of the Opposition, has moved so far away from the rule of law demonstrates the fragility of our grasp of a liberal, democratic society," he said. "If we stand silent in the face of discrimination and in violation of the basic principles of humanity, then we betray our way of life."
Read more here.

Desal cash for Council


SMH Spike column considers Council's decision yesterday to lease part of the former Woolworths building opposite Town Hall to one of the two bidders for Sydney's controversial desalination plant (see Malcolm Turnbull's speech on sustainability blogged here earlier). They ask - hypocrisy or acting economic responsibly? I voted for the later.

Fields of Clover
TALK about having your salted cake and eating it too.
The Lord Mayor, Clover Moore, and most of her merry band of City of Sydney councillors resolved in August that they were "strongly opposed" to Morris Dilemma's de-salting water factory.
Council minutes show the declaratory motion was put up by the Liberal councillor Shayne Mallard and supported by Moore's Village People and the Greens councillor, Chris Harris. The three Labor councillors opposed it. Cut to yesterday's extraordinary council meeting. The same council voted, with only Harris opposing, to lease part of its Woolworths building at Town Hall to a group bidding to build the desalination plant.
Freshwater Alliance got its new offices for a undisclosed, seven-figure sum. We guess that makes the council more economic realists than hypocrites.

spike@smh.com.au Spikeline: 9282 2080 Fax: 9282 3253

Tuesday, November 29, 2005

Senate safeguards Freedom of Speech


Liberal Senator Marise Payne has chaired a senate inquiry into the Federal governments proposed anti-terror laws and focused on the controversial sedition laws. Whilst the Senate may be in the control of the government any Senate inquiry that delivers bi-partisan recommendations would be ignored at the government's peril. The report below from today's Telegraph accurately covers the issue.

Sedition law threat to freedom
By MALCOLM FARR
November 29, 2005
LIBERAL senators told the Federal Government yesterday its controversial re-write of sedition laws should be scrapped.
They joined Labor in urging the proposals be sent to a review by the Australian Law Reform Commission.
Existing laws covering treason and incitement to violence could be used while the laws were being reviewed.
The senators, members of a committee inquiring into anti-terror laws, also said the Government should review other measures every five years, rather than 10 as planned.
Those measures included preventative detention without charge or trial, and control orders limiting movement.
The Government wants the provisions contained in its Anti-Terrorism Bill passed into law before Christmas.
It had originally allowed for only a one-day Senate inquiry but granted a week after political pressure.
The committee chair, Liberal Marise Payne, said it had received 300 submissions during the brief inquiry and the overwhelming bulk had shown concern about the "updated" sedition laws.
There were claims they could be used to prevent journalists covering security issues, smother legitimate dissent, and censor the arts.
Senator Payne said Attorney-General Philip Ruddock had promised a review of the laws after they were passed. The committee recommended the review be held before the provisions were enacted.
"Given the significant concerns about the sedition provisions raised by a broad range of organisations, the committee as a whole considered that it was inappropriate to enact legislation which is considered in need of review," Senator Payne said.
"The committee has recommended that the sedition provisions be removed from the Bill in its entirety, pending a full and independent review by the Australian Law Reform Commission."
The committee generally endorsed the increased powers for ASIO and law enforcement agencies, but wanted tighter monitoring of their application.
It recommended the Ombudsman play a more significant role, and the laws would lapse after five years, when they would be reviewed, rather than the 10 years the Government wanted.
The committee said "measures proposed in the Bill are extraordinary in nature and it is appropriate that the responsible minister report regularly to the Parliament, and that there be an independent review of the operation in their entirety and a report to Parliament after five years".
It also urged that minors be separated from adults when in detention; the removal of restrictions on the role of lawyers of people under preventative detention; supplying reasons why a person has been detained; and a right for detainees to make representations before being detained.

Friday, November 25, 2005

Sydney falls behind Melbourne yet again! and Cyclists demonstrate their Rights to our Streets

From the Melbourne Herald Sun news that 'Copenhagen' style bike lanes are being proposed. IE bike lanes where physical barriers are placed between bike lanes and traffic - unlike the CCT bike lanes blogged earlier.

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/printpage/0,5481,17308681,00.html

Euro-style plan for bicycle city John Ferguson 21nov05

BICYCLE super-stations and key changes to traffic flows are part of a controversial $10 million plan to bring European-style commuting to Melbourne.Riders will be able to park, shower and even drink coffee at cafes attached to several major bike stations dotted across the city.
Melbourne City Council is also backing sweeping changes to bike paths to make commuting safer.
Councillor Peter Clarke wants expanded a push to create Copenhagen-style bike paths into the CBD.
These paths involve placing physical barriers between riders and motor vehicles.
Parked cars can be shifted further into the roadway to enable bikes to travel protected, next to the gutter.
This option will alter traffic flows in some areas, with the trade-off being increased safety to riders and pedestrians.
Cr Clarke said a key part of his vision involved building several bike super-stations where riders could shower, store their bike and even drink coffee.
Areas that could be used for the super-stations include the Docklands, the vaults under Federation Square, the city baths and in the parliamentary precinct.
"You could have a proper shower, treat these places like a small lounge," Cr Clarke said.
He said the strategy -- which would require initial funding of $2 million a year -- was not anti-car.
"Far from it. It's not about impeding vehicles, it's about providing a viable alternative," Cr Clarke said.
Thousands of cyclists commute to the city each day but rising numbers of motor vehicles throughout Melbourne are making the trips increasingly perilous.
The City of Melbourne has already supported a limited trial of a safer bike path, between Melbourne University and RMIT.
But Cr Clarke has outlined up to 12 major bike routes into the city that he believes need further attention.
St Kilda Rd is one of the key roads that feeds cyclists into the streets of the CBD.
He described commuting along Flinders St as being particularly dangerous for cyclists.
Lord Mayor John So is also backing the new deal for cyclists, saying the idea of super-stations was gleaned from Copenhagen.
Cr So said that cycling was an essential part of the council's transport strategy.
The council was eager to considerably increase bicycle use in the city.
"I don't see why the Copenhagen model can't be adopted in Melbourne," he said.
In Copenhagen, visitors or residents are also able to take part in a free bike exchange where they pay a small price to borrow a bike, with the fee refunded when the bike is returned.
Bicycle Victoria's Sean Pinan said for a relatively small investment, commuters could be encouraged to ride if the facilities were user-friendly.
BV has backed the use of the Government's controversial congestion tax to help pay for the $15 million it believes is needed to implement a rider-friendly strategy for the CBD.
Cr Clarke said the tax had made no difference to city congestion.
"This is about dealing with the problem, not taxing people," he said.



Meanwhile tonight on Park Street outside Town Hall hundreds of cyclists stretching from George ST to Hyde Park demonstrated their determination to be seen and heard on our roads as equal users. I arrived out front too late to get a good picture of the two wheeled mass but did witness the empty STA bus that tried to push through the cyclists and was abruptly halted by the cyclist police shown.

Earlier in the day I walked with the Lord Mayor through the CBD to a meeting and we spotted a law abiding cycle courier with the extended long frame and rack that allows him to compete with motor vehicle bookings. I pointed out to the Lord Mayor that the cyclist courier represented one less courier van or truck running around the CBD and clogging up the cities arteries and damaging the envoronment. A very CBD sustainable alternative. With the World Bike Courier Championships in Sydney late next year and over 300 international competitors and their supporters converging on Sydney and Olympic Park in heated couirer competitions, I have asked Council to sponsor the traditional welcome breakfast at the home of bike couriers - Martin Place and to work with the bike couriers to encourage responsible riding in our city. We can then move on to the motorised couriers, taxi and bus drivers.


Labor's Environmental White Elephant

A day at various business functions and meetings in Sydney has left me with no doubt that the Labor Iemma/Carr government has lost the plot by going ahead with the desalination project to meet Sydney's water crisis. The announcement this morning (see SMH) was a spin doctors attempt to blunt the sharp edges of PPP's following the Cross City Tunnel fiasco. With a $1 billion buy back price tag on the dud tunnel and penalties for establishing competing services - including public transport corridors, the public and business sectors are rightly distrusting of the Labor government's ability to deliver a cost effective PPP or hybrid PPP as we have been presented.

Whilst the Labor government seems to have removed the excessive annual payments to the private sector that Malcolm Turnbull MP referred to in his speech on the Sustainable Cities report (read it on my blog here), it now suddenly requires $1.3 billion of taxpayers capital investment! That's $60 on every household water bill each year and only to meet about 10% of Sydney's water needs. Water recycling and storm water harvesting are the only way ahead. But they required planning at least 5 years ago and it's all too late for Morris Iemma who needs a quick fix to win the next election and who has been handed the poison chalice by Carr. For as the great expanse of Sydney's traditional green Kikuyu and couch lawns whither away and the sound of summer sprinklers become stories passed on by grandfathers, the reality of Labor's poor planning is biting home. And no razzle dazzle desalination plant is going to deflect the growing suburban anger. And this from a government who lectures the Howard team on not signing Kyoto....

Untapped resource ... stormwater swirls from an ocean pipe at Dover Heights. Soon ocean water will be turned into drinking water further down the coast.Photo: Peter Rae SMH on line


Sydney Morning Herald's Editorial Column
Taking the easy option
November 24, 2005

The heavens are mocking Sydney's proposed desalination plant. As the Premier, Morris Iemma, announced the $1.3 billion project, heavy showers were sweeping past his offices in Governor Macquarie Tower. It was a timely reminder that historically Sydney has not been short of rain. The city is short of water because it wastes it. Sydney needs a long-term plan for recycling waste water and storm water. Desalination remains the quick fix; finding water to waste instead of saving the water we have.

The desalination plant is another hand-me-down from former premier Bob Carr that Mr Iemma has uncritically embraced as the easy thing to do. It puts Sydney in the absurd position of spending $1.3 billion on a desalination plant it must pray it will never need. It is no surprise that it will be financed by the State Government; no private organisation would take on such a ludicrous endeavour. And the question must be whether the public should take it on either. After becoming Premier, Mr Iemma should have cast fresh eyes over such a bleak financial prospect. What could $1.3 billion otherwise provide in water-saving incentives to households and industry; or new infrastructure; or wholesale recycling of the water Sydney dumps in the ocean? We do not know the options because the Government hasn't bothered to do the sums. So much for fiscal responsibility from the man who is not only Premier, but Treasurer.

Sydney's modest consolation is that the plant at Kurnell might have cost more. The Government has opted for a relatively small plant producing 125 megalitres of drinking water a day, enough to supply 350,000 people, instead of up to $2.5 billion for a plant to supply a third of Sydney's needs. Though government-owned, the plant will be built and operated by private industry and the hapless water users will foot the bill. The Government says that will be about $1.20 a week each for the 1.6 million households served by Sydney Water. Read more.

Related coverage
Buckets of money down the drain
Part-time plant a waste
This time take a close look at the fine print
By Anne Davies, Wendy Frew and Matthew MooreNovember 24, 2005

Sydney's planned desalination plant will be smaller than expected and funded by taxpayers not the private sector, after the NSW Government decided it needed more flexibility on operating the energy-intensive plant.
The Premier, Morris Iemma, announced yesterday the Government would commission the smallest plant on its drawing board - one capable of producing 125 megalitres a day - at a cost of up to $1.3 billion.
Sydney Water will look at increasing water prices to help pay for it - an extra $1.20 a week on the average bill, Mr Iemma said.
"This will make us less reliant on rain for our water supply," he said. "It will also be our insurance policy, when the next drought occurs or if this drought persists."
The plant at Kurnell will still be built by the private sector and operated and maintained by one of the water companies that tendered for the project.
The Utilities Minister, Carl Scully, said a 125-megalitre plant would meet 9 per cent of Sydney's daily needs. However, the Government has retained the option of building a plant capable of producing 500 megalitres a day.
Mr Scully said the estimated cost of the 500-megalitre plant was $2.5 billion, not $2 billion as previously stated.
The Government says the decision to keep the plant gives it much-needed flexibility. "When the dam levels are full obviously we won't operate the plant," Mr Scully said.
He said the Government would have been obliged to compensate a private operator if the plant was not in use.
However, some water experts suggest turning a reverse osmosis desalination plant on and off might not be straightforward. "It can be done, but the membranes have to be 'pickled' with a preserving solution," said Greg Leslie, associate professor at the University of NSW's centre for membrane science.
Read more.

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

Council needs a role in Protecting Privacy

The SMH reports that private video camera surveillance systems are being set up by Sydney-siders to spy on and even intimidate their neighbours. In his report to Parliament the acting privacy Commissioner John Dickie has highlighted to proliferation of cameras in the private domain and the lack of ability those affected by them have for legal recourse and protection.

Mr Dickie said many complaints involved multiple cameras, including one incident in which a household set up six cameras to spy on the neighbouring property. The commissioner's annual report, tabled in Parliament last week, said the practice had increased but police and councils were had no remedy for such complaints."The activity seems to fall between the cracks of existing laws," the report said. "It is an area of disputation which ought not be allowed to continue without some recourse being available."

It's not clear if Councils have the ability to protect privacy in these circumstances. As a Councillor I have previously expressed concerns about private CCTV installed over the public domain - often a requirement of a development consent. Walk along many Sydney streets and private cameras will film you from hotel and club awnings and convenience store doorways often streaming back to unknown control rooms or recorders. I acknowledge the legitimate security role these cameras play and the assistance they often provide to Police investigating crimes. However their installation and management should be subject to conditions or protocols that protect privacy and guarantee the responsible management of the images and any feed.


We have already seen images of actors in brawls or women in revealing fashions offered for sale to the media and on the internet. There is growing community concern about the filming of children and juvenile's for inappropriate purposes. A number of inner city apartment blocks have adopted the growing trend to install CCTV within building common areas (eg carparks, doorways, rubbish areas and halls) and feed the live images back to all occupants in the building via their television sets. The developers claim that this allows every resident to be an unpaid security guard. Attractive as this may seem on face value - to think that a building busy-body is sitting in their lounge room watching your every move is at least disturbing.

Council's network of cameras covering much of the CBD are protected by a strict set of protocols that can be adapted for other camera systems. With regard to cameras installed in the private domain and filming neighbours, I suspect a legitimate need to apply for a Development Consent and will ask Council at the next meeting to investigate and report how we can better regulate the proliferation of private cameras to safeguard privacy. People affected by the potential intrusion of cameras have a right to object and a level of protection. If Council's are powerless to regulate CCTV then parliament needs to consider an amendment to the planning laws.
Read more

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

The Failed Exit Strategy


From Town Hall meetings to world politics. I thought the quote from George Bush in today's press very powerful. The picture accompanying it of the President exiting a press conference only to discover the door locked is quite amusing and had to give rise to the inevitable 'exit strategy' captions.

"Free people did not falter in the Cold War, and free people will not falter in the war on terror. Like the ideology of communism, the ideology of Islamic radicalism is destined to fail - because the will to power is no match for the universal desire to live in freedom." President Bush in Mongolia.

Picture above: "Failed exit strategy ... George Bush finds himself in a spot of bother as he pulls on a locked door while trying to leave a news conference in Beijing" Photo: AP /SMH

Bush praises Mongolian hordes for revisiting Iraq
November 22, 2005
George Bush yesterday became the first US president to visit Mongolia, thanking the heirs of Genghis Khan for sending troops to join his "war against terror".
Mr Bush stopped in the bitterly cold Mongolian capital, Ulan Bator, for four hours on his way home from an Asian tour that has taken him to Japan, South Korea and China.
In a speech to Mongolian leaders and members of parliament at the central government building, Mr Bush said Mongolians had stood with Americans as "brothers in the cause of freedom". The nation of 2.8 million mostly nomadic people has sent 160 soldiers to Iraq - the first Mongolian soldiers in the country since a son of Genghis Khan sacked Baghdad in 1258 and slaughtered most of its Muslim population. The number is small but White House officials pointed out to reporters that, per capita, only two other countries - Britain and Denmark - had sent more of their soldiers to Iraq.
Read more.


Monday, November 21, 2005

Redfern Oval proposal is a Win Win


Public debate on the future of Redfern Oval has taken many twists and turns over the past 5 years since the former South Sydney City Council initiated a task force to consider its future. In one team is the Rabbitohs patriarch and saviour George Piggins and leading the other team is defender of the parklands Clover Moore. There have been many speeches and heated public meetings and tonight's Council meeting will (or should) adopt a position for the Council staff to start the master planning for the redevelopment with some certainty. Council's report recommends that the Oval be upgraded to a first class training facility for Souths and the Juniors with a capacity of 8,000 spectators including a modern small stadium approximately to the size of the existing obsolete grand stand. The grand stand is to include appropriate facilities such as change rooms. The Souths position is a stadium capable of 1st grade games all season.

Most eCouncillor readers will be aware of the historic links the Souths Rugby League club has had with the Redfern Oval ground going back over half a century. Souths historically emerged from the oppressive over-crowded working class suburbs of Redfern Waterloo to become one of the great teams of League's classic era. George Piggins and his supporters seem intent on recapturing that lost glory by returning to Redfern Oval with various proposals for a ground capable of NRL 1st grade games. But the park, facilities and neighbourhood are just not capable of sustaining a permanent home for 1st grade games with facilities needed for over 20,000 spectators. The fair argument is also made that with the modern Aussie Stadium less than 2km away at Moore Park, Souths can train at Redfern Oval and play home games at Aussie retaining a close tie to their deep community roots that extend well beyong the immediate Redfern Waterloo community.

I support the Council proposal as a way forward but believe that Souths should have the ability to play a few 'heritage' matches at Redfern Oval each season. These would be the games expected to draw smaller crowds and be subject to a strict DA process to manage issues such as crowd control and traffic impacts. To facilitate this and the Koori Cup weekend the ground perimeter will need to be fenced. This can be done with hired temporary fencing as we see around the city regularly. However I am not opposed to an appropriately designed permanent perimeter fencing so long as large openings are in place on each side and the gates are open and closed each day by the Council. In fact as the report recommends the whole ground must remain in the control of the Council and not licensed to Souths as has been the historical situation.

Last week's Council Committee considered a proposal by the PCYC to have a youth club relocated from the nearby public housing estate to the base of the grandstand. This proposal was opposed by the Clover Moore councillors but I agreed that it warranted further investigation. There are some terrific synergies with community partnerships and League player mentoring that appear evident in this proposal. However a preliminary investigation by Council staff has recommended against the proposal based on significantly increased costs and the nearly 4 times larger grand stand needed to accommodate the club. The whole issue has spilled over into the State parliament with the local ALP member attacking Clover Moore (the MP for Bligh). I noted my Liberal colleague the gallant Barry O'Farrell riding in to Clover's defence.

Tonight's debate promises to be a historical moment for South and Piggins.

STOP PRESS

The following amendments proposed by me were adopted at the Council meeting. They leave open the opportunity for perimeter fencing that will satisfy Souths and South's Juniors playing some games on Redfern Oval.

Amendment to 8.2

add to (iii) after 'training ground'

(iii) Provision of facilities to allow the use of the ground as Souths NRL football club preferred training ground and subject to Plan of Management and Development Application processes, a ground for a limited number of preseason training or exhibition matches.

(ix) remove Cr McInerney additional amendment and replace with:

'investigate the possibility of new perimeter fencing of artistic and functional merit and designed by competition reflecting the Rabbitohs cultural and sporting connection to Redfern Oval. Such commemorative fencing will be as unobtrusive as possible and incorporate large retractable openings at gates and other points on the perimeter. The day to day operation and management of the gates and openings is to remain in Council's control.'

Moved Councillor Mallard





Sunday, November 20, 2005

Weekend Pics - Sculpture by the Sea

A late visit to a seasonal favourite the 'Sculpture by the Sea' exhibition was in time to hear Malcolm Turnbull announce this year's people's choice award Michael Purdy's time and space (facial deconstruction) 2005. The SMH today discusses the work pictured below.



Denise Hume - refuge


Jarrod taylor - structural wave (in background of refuge)


Ben Resch 'the great aussie surf trip'


Verna Truninger - messengers

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

CCT bike lanes Not Safe


My thanks to Fiona in the bicycle community for her tireless work on improving cycling facilities and safety on Sydney streets. This is the eastern portal the CCT and is also what has been approved for Oxford Street and William Street upgrades. For information the bike lanes are shared with the bike friendly buses.

"The attached photo is of the "bike lane" on Craigend Street, Rushcutters Bay. Is this as good as it gets for bikes in a $680 million project? The RTA Project Manager responsible for this should be made to ride in it daily, perhaps. Then his successor would be motivated to get it right.

The bus stops appear to require the use of the bike lane. Is this how it is supposed to be? Could there be a site meeting to work out what needs to be done to make the bike lanes usable, let alone something that will encourage cycling?

Someone cynical might put it to the RTA Project Manager that in trying to maximise the number of car trips through the tunnel for the RTA's financial gain, he is not supposed to be toying with people's lives. Please would you help us resolve what is surely a completely unsatisfactory result.
"

Always listen to the Fine Print

Spike today takes a closer look at Clover Moore's promise to donate her salary to charity. It appears that the 'cat's out of the bag' and the Lord Mayor has been holding back the Councillor allowance component of her package - about $25,000 per annum or $100,000 over the term of Council. Whilst the decision to create a trust and donate her Mayoral allowance is to be acknowledged as generous - it was in fact forced upon her when the 'two jobs' issue was becoming a negative in her run for the mayoral chains. The donation is a political decision and many people see it as inappropriate that Council resources are used to promote the charity trust in Council publications and media releases.

Fields of Clover
By Joel Gibson and Tim DickNovember 15, 2005

Illustration: Rocco Fazzari see great cartoon here

The term "per cent" is an adverb meaning "in every hundred", so 100 per cent equals everything, as in: all, the lot, the entire historical cast of Neighbours, including Mrs Mangle.
During last year's election campaign, Clover Moore pledged to gift her salary to charity should she win the lord mayoralty. Her website now proclaims: "I receive a salary as a NSW Member of Parliament, and donate 100% of the Lord Mayor's fees for charitable purposes through this Trust."
But 100 per cent of her civic fees is not given to charity. The mayoral salary has two parts: the basic "annual fee" paid to all city councillors ($25,850) and an "additional fee" for the lord mayor ($141,900).
A slice of the second fee goes to her deputy, and the rest goes to the trust. In addition to $110,650 she gets as an MP, she pockets $25,850, meaning she actually donates 83.17 per cent of what she gets from the council.
Was her claim misleading? Hell no, according to Clover, who told us the legislation clearly distinguishes between councillor and mayoral fees, and asked if we weren't missing the point: she is donating half a million dollars to charity over this term. Well, maybe, suppose so. She says she gets no tax benefit for it, either.

Green madness at Waverley

The Greens on Waverley Council have lost the plot with their illogical attack on one of Australia's great cultural traditions and rights - the backyard pool. The article below from today's Sydney Morning Herald demonstrates how irrational the Greens have become. The Greens want backyard pools banned to save water - yet Sydney Water says pools use on 2% of the water used by Sydney homes. 'This compares with 15% flushed down the toilet and 17% in washing machines.' Will the Greens be advocating a ban on toilet flushing and washing clothes soon? What's behind this madness is a barely disguised disdain for conspicuous consumerism and wealth. The photograph below from the SMH illustrates the investments households make in the backyard pools. It is often said the Greens are 'water melons - green on the outside and red inside' and with some antecedents in the communist movements this is an example of that anti-capital mantra bubbling to the surface. It took the Waverley Labor Councillors a very long time to disassociate from the Green motion. I expect it will be defeated at tonight's meeting and remembered at the next election.


Waverley residents defend their pools
By Bonnie Malkin and Richard MaceyNovember 15, 2005

Laps of luxury Â… backyard pools abound in the beachfront suburb of Dover Heights.Photo: Robert Pearce
Related coverage
Idea: stop flushing millions of dollars down the toilet
Waverley Council will press ahead with plans to vote on banning swimming pools, lap pools and plunge pools tonight despite widespread criticism.
The swimming pool industry and home owners have called on the council to withdraw the motion to prohibit new pools, but Waverley's Mayor, Mora Main, said the council still wanted to discuss the issue.
"The debate has been quite good. It has caused a bit of a riot and has challenged traditional Aussie values about the backyard, but it's nice to see people thinking about water," she said.
Cr Main said she and fellow Greens councillor George Copeland want to investigate banning pools to save water.
But the president of the Swimming Pool and Spa Association of NSW, Manfred Wiesemes, said residential pools accounted for less than 10 per cent of the annual household water used in greater Sydney.
"When a pool is filled with water it can remain full for 10 years or more. They do need a bit of extra water from time to time but the majority of that is added by rain," he said.
The highest concentration of pools in Sydney was in the eastern and northern suburbs, such as Ku-ring-gai and Lane Cove, he said.
The president of the Local Government Association, Genia McCaffery, said motion's intention was good but it was better to assess each pool individually.
The motion comes a day after the Bureau of Meteorology said this year would be the hottest year since records began in 1910.
Read more here.

Sunday, November 13, 2005

Weekend Pics - Spanish festival & Jacarandahs


Sydney's November garden show is on.
Jacarandah on Challis Avenue Potts Point

St Marys cathedral

Sunday's Spanish Festival in the 'Latin Quarter' of town (between St Andrews cathedral and China Town. Lots of people out for a fun day with food, sangria and entertainment.


Love grape vines for softening buildings.


Saturday, November 12, 2005

Costello's blunt message

Somewhat confrontational fellow right of centre blogger Toby (Bilious Young Fogey) picks up on the Treasurer's comments in Parliament this week and I find that I could not agree more. We need to draw a line on this anti-Australian undemocratic agenda and not allow it to prosper under the protection of a politically correct umbrella.
It does not go unnoticed that inner city Labor party members are those opposing the anti-terror laws and arrests in different jurisdictions. Where are the Labor lawyers from Bankstown or Canberra? Perhaps the terminally weakened Kim Beazley et al have left another political vacuum just like the war in Iraq now filled by members of the inner city trendy Labor left. SMH on terror day in court.

To the point
Australians are famously blunt.

The Federal Treasurer:
"If you are somebody who wants to live in an Islamic state governed by sharia law you are not going to be happy in Australia, because Australia is not an Islamic state, will never be an Islamic state and will never be governed by sharia law. We are a secular state under our constitution, our law is made by parliament elected in democratic elections. We do not derive our laws from religious instruction. There are Islamic states around the world that practise sharia law and if thatÂ’s your object you may well be much more at home in such a country than trying to turn Australia into one of those countries, because itÂ’s not going to happen."


Thursday, November 10, 2005

Malcolm Turnbull on Sustainable Cities Inquiry


On 12 September 2005, the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Environment and Heritage tabled its report on the inquiry into sustainable cities entitled "Sustainable Cities".
On Tuesday night Liberal Wentworth MP and member of the committee Malcolm Turnbull provided an informative and animated overview of the report, why the Federal Government undertook this inquiry, what the report recommendations are, how will they be implemented and what this report means for Sydney. It was no surprise to hear that the bi-partisan report dovetails with the Council's campaign for a shift in investment in the City from roads to public transport. In fact the report points to this growing trend all over the western world - including car loving USA. Malcolm's address dealt in detail with one of his recurring topics - water recycling with a scathing assessment of the Carr/Iemma government's proposal to build a desalination plant. Another PPP that has all the hallmarks of a one sided deal like the CCT. It should be noted that Council adopted my resolution to oppose the desalination plant as a solution to Sydney's water crisis instead calling upon the government to implement improved water reycling and harvesting methods.

Malcolm was joined by Professor Peter Newman who is the NSW Sustainability Commissioner who explained his response to the report saying that finally the Federal government has seen the light for our capital cities. A thorough Q&A session included the ABC celebrity host Adam Spencer dishing up the old 'the Howard government will not sign Kyoto' mantra which was deftly hit for a six by Malcolm pointing out that we are on target to exceed reductions in greenhouse gas emissions dictated by Kioto and people should move beyond the signing of a piece of paper to more sustained outcomes for the environment. The transcript of Malcolm Turnbulls speech is below and viable at is web site:


http://www.turnbullforwentworth.org.au/news/default.asp?action=article&ID=344

Links to the report and evidence transcripts are at the bottom of the speech.



"Sustainable Cities" - Malcolm Turnbull speaks in the City Talks Series at Sydney Town Hall
Tuesday, November 08, 2005
Lord Mayor, Clover Moore, thank you very much for your kind words and for inviting me to speak tonight. Robert Whitehead, marketing manager of the Sydney Morning Herald, thank you for your support of this event and in particular for the outstanding series on the state of Sydney which your newspaper published earlier this year. Councillors, former Lord Mayors, Ladies and Gentlemen, About six weeks ago the House of Representatives Standing Committee on the Environment produced a report entitled “Sustainable Cities”. Mal Washer MP was our chairman, although the inquiry had commenced in the previous parliament with Bruce Bilson as its Chair.

The Report considers the state of our great cities, describes their unsustainability and makes important recommendations about how the Commonwealth can provide further national leadership to ensure our cities are developed sustainably and responsibly. The Committee is a bipartisan one. It had six Liberals: Mal Washer, Russel Broadbent, Jackie Kelly, Stewart McArthur, Jason Wood and myself and four Labor members: Jennie George, Kelly Hoare, Harry Jenkins, Duncan Kerr. There were no dissentients from its recommendations. The members were from New South Wales, Victoria, Western Australia and Tasmania and from both city and regional electorates. Peter Newman has already given us the best definition of sustainable development from the 1987 World Commission on Environment and Development (the Brundtland Commission): “..development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” But first a little background. We are an urban nation: nearly two thirds of our population live in our capital cities and more than 80% live in cities with populations of more than 50,000. 40% of our population live in Sydney and Melbourne alone. These cities not only house the bulk of our population they are the main drivers of our economy and becoming more so as services occupy a larger part of our GDP.

It has been obvious for many years that our cities face enormous challenges. Congestion, pollution, water and power shortages to name just a few. We live in the driest continent, yet Australia consumes the most water per capita in the world 1540 kilolitres per annum. North America is 1510 and Europe 665. In a world challenged by global warming our greenhouse gas emissions are also the world’s highest at 27 tonnes per capita per year. Another UN Report puts us second in Co2 emissions, just behind the USA. With petrol prices rising in response to growing demand from China and India, our dependency on the automobile has increased. Vehicle kilometres travelled has increased by almost 60% in cities like Sydney between 1980 and 2000. Our domestic waste stream is 620 kilograms per capita per year: second only to the United States. We recycle very little of our waste water, around 2% in Sydney. Our high consumption, low sustainability cities are bad for our health too. Our automobile dependence has made us fat. The Committee heard that by living on a free way ‘you are four times more likely to be obese than if you do not.” Are these the inevitable consequences of urban growth? Is this just a by product of prosperity, a modern example of “where there’s muck there’s brass.” Are the proponents of sustainability condemning us to a poorer, less comfortable world? Not at all.

Consider public transport. Peter Newman has demonstrated that cities with a higher useage of rail, as opposed to private automobiles, are wealthier not least because they spend less on transport. Many world cities as wealthy or wealthier than our own (London, Berlin, Paris, Zurich to name but a few) emit much less CO2 in transport emissions. Consider water: do we seriously imagine that we would be poorer if Sydney were to have a sustainable supply of water. Our unsustainable cities are the inevitable consequence of years of complacency, of years of folly. Sydney’s unsustainability is probably the most perilous in Australia. We are literally at risk of running out of water due to a failure to embrace sustainable management of our water. There are more cars on our roads than ever with more congestion, more pollution and more expense.

We are witnessing today, literally under our feet, the latest chapter in this sorry and perverse tale of mismanagement:the Cross City Tunnel. After receiving an upfront golden handshake of over a hundred million dollars, the State Labor Government set out to ensure that the tunnel operators achieved the highest possible revenue. They did this by creating congestion in the city and surrounds to force people into the tunnel. Their contractual obligations, not yet fully revealed or understood, involve substantial financial risks for the Government should it dare, heaven forbid, to improve the quality of public transport in the vicinity such as to reduce vehicular traffic below the owners’ assumptions on the major arterial roads connecting to the trunnel. An obvious avenue for expansion of our public transport network as Gary Glazebrook explained in his report on light rail commissioned by the City of Sydney is from Central and the CBD out along Anzac Parade, servicing the showground precinct, the racecourse, University of NSW and the southern end of the Eastern Suburbs. But this is part of the prime catchment for the Cross City Tunnel. Why do we build new rail infrastructure? To provide an alternative to private vehicles and reduce traffic on the roads. Yet if that were done, the Labor Government would face a renegotiation of the CCT contract and potentially a heavy financial cost. So here is the short, harsh reality: the Labor Government here in Sydney has entered into a contract compelling it to inflict congestion on our city and deterring it from expanding public transport all in the interests of ensuring a privately owned tunnel can make a profit. All this at a time when it is obvious that a key priority of Government should be to provide alternatives to private vehicle travel to reduce congestion.

Former NSW Auditor General Tony Harris astutely described this complacency when he said that Bob Carr’s political style had been so successful it had become a model for all other State and Territory Labor leaders. “Gone is the idea that governments should lead and should challenge vested interests. It has been replaced by Carr’s model: a government should act more like a concierge offering modest assistance to residents but not intervening. Governments should certainly not reform markets or challenge society, even if that is necessary to enable them to meet contemporary problems.” [AFR 18/3/2005 p. 83] What a contrast with the Federal Government! With a strong economy offering every temptation to complacency and resting on the laurels won from past reforms, John Howard’s Government approaches its first decade with an enthusiasm for reform as keen as it was on the day it was elected.

We have known for decades that oil was a finite resource. We have known for decades that water is a scarce commodity not a free good. Yet, with few exceptions, State Governments have persisted in and exacerbated unsustainable practices to the point where the viability of our cities is at risk. For millennia a necessary requirement of urban life has been a reliable supply of safe drinking water. The remnants of the Roman aqueducts still march across the European countryside reminding us that water science and engineering is a perennial problem. Great cities have died, literally, when the water ran out. Assuming there are no increases in water supply all of our largest cities will face a significant water deficit: a gap between sustainable yield and demand. Sydney and Brisbane will be the worst off with a gap of 38% and 33% respectively. To put that in absolute numbers, if you assume Sydney’s sustainable yield is 600 billion litres (itself an optimistic assumption), total demand will be 826 billion litres. The NSW Government’s own Metropolitan Water Plan stated last year “Sydney is using more water than is sustainable…water could be a key limiting factor on Sydney’s future growth and prosperity.” And those limits could be considerably more severe than we think. We have seen very significant reductions in rainfall across Southern and Eastern Australia. The average stream flow from 1911 -2003 in Perth was 285 billion litres. From 1975 to 2003 it had reduced to 164 billion litres. The fall is even more precipitous if you consider the mean over the last 7 years where it has reduced to 120 billion litres.

Turning to Sydney, there is grave concern that the estimates of sustainable yield, based on 95 year averages, are no longer valid. If, as it would appear, there has been a real shift downwards in rainfall, then the long term averages are irrelevant. Sydney’s 600 billion litres of sustainable yield may be a serious over estimate. For example the long term average inflow into the Hawkesbury Nepean system is 1,442 billion litres pa. The average over the period 1991-2002 is 697 billion litres. More than a decade ago Sydney Water knew that it needed substantially to augment the water supply for Sydney. This was driven by growth in demand. That need of course is much greater now with the drop in streamflows. There were basically only two viable options: a new dam, or large scale recycling. Everything else was either not big enough, or in the case of desalination, too expensive. The Labor Government vetoed both a new dam and raising the dam wall at Warragamba and then for a decade has done virtually nothing. They just hoped it would rain. But the rains did not come and we find ourselves now in the extraordinary situation where the dams are only 38.8% full. If the drought continues for two years the city will run out of water. And what has been the price of this folly? In a desperate effort to find a quick fix, Morris Iemma’s Government has resolved to build a desalination plant. The desalination plant, likely to cost around $2 billion, is estimated by the Government’s own consultants to deliver fresh water at a cost of $1.53 per thousand litres.

The former Premier Mr Carr described desalination as bottled electricity and that was no exaggeration. As the parliamentary library recently noted the energy requirement for desalinating seawater is between 4 and 5 times as high as it is for wastewater reclamation. So this is not only the most expensive water available, it will also generate substantially increased greenhouse gas emissions. For whatever reason Sydney Water has declined to embrace recycling The opponents of recycling have contended that people will not drink recycled water. This “yuk factor” is a false issue both in terms of science and practicality. It is scientifically false because we know there is no obstacle to purifying waste water. The drugs and pathogens which need to be excluded have a larger molecular size than the salt which is removed by R/O. So, as Prof Greg Leslie, has pointed out if you believe R/O can desalinate it can certainly purify. But from a practical point of view there is simply no need to introduce recycled water into the potable water system.

There are ample uses for recycled water: industrial, parks, gardens, street cleaning and above all, replenishing the streamflows of our rivers and thereby replacing the potable water currently released into them. The desalination plant is likely to be the greatest white elephant ever constructed in this State. A plant of this kind has to have a take or pay contract so that the owners know they will be paid something even if, because of high rainfall, there is no need for their water. The normal deal is 60% of the contract price. So if the plant is to provide 180 billion litres at $1.50 a kilolitre that’s $270 million a year. If the rains come and the dams full, our State would be up for $155 million for water it never received. But it is better to pay 90 cents for water you don’t receive than $1.50 for water you don’t need. On the other other hand recycling achieves an important environmental objective: cleaning up the oceans regardless.

The failure to provide for a sustainable water supply for this city has resulted in water restrictions which are likely to become more severe unless there is a major break in the weather patterns. The approach has been to make people with gardens feel they are responsible for the water shortage, as opposed to the politicians who failed to plan for our water needs. The truth is that we all benefit from our gardens. We should be able to water them, we should aim to have enough water to maintain a green city. As my friend Ian Kiernan, the founder of Clean Up Australia, says again and again it is not the supply of water which has failed us, we have failed to manage our water. This failure to embrace recycling is particularly puzzling given the National Water Initiative. A Howard Government initiative to which the States signed up at COAG, it has the backing of $2 billion of Federal money in the Australian Govt Water Fund, It has as a key objective for urban water reform: “ encourage the re-use and recycling of wastewater where cost effective.”

Peter Newman has spoken about transport already and I touched briefly on the problems of car dependency in our city already. I would simply re-emphasise that it is patently obvious that we need to promote the use of public transport and we cannot do that unless we are prepared to make mass transit safe, reliable, clean and above all faster on the main corridors than private cars. Distance is a temporal not a linear concept Yet the government’s answer has been to speed up the cars and slow down the trains. So what’s the solution offered by the Sustainable Cities Report? The National Competition Policy over the last decade has together with other economic reforms driven by the Howard Government substantially improved our productivity.

It has been a Commonwealth led initiative with incentive payments to the States for opening up their sheltered monopolies to competition. This recognised that all governments would share in the benefits of economic growth occasioned by this reform and that the bulk of that benefit would accrue to the Commonwealth. The Sustainable Cities report recommends we follow that model and establish a Sustainability Commission which would agree on sustainability benchmarks against which government policies would be judged. The allocation of Federal funds , especially to transport, water and other infrastructure, would depend on meeting those benchmarks which would of course also apply to the Federal Government. Incentive payments should also be considered to reward governments which meet the benchmarks. This would reinforce the leadership shown already with Auslink which included $1.8 billion in rail projects that should double the freight capacity of the North South rail network within 5 years. It would reinforce the $2 billion of the Australian Government Water Fund which is committed to supporting the objectives of the National Water Initiative. The Sustainable Cities Report makes a number of other important recommendations consistent with those relating to governance. These include: - Australian Government transport infrastructure funds include support for public transport and active transport (dedicated bicycle ways) - Removing the FBT concessions for company cars which encourage greater use of these motor vehicles - The preparation of an independent report on the water options for all of our major cities - A doubling of the photovoltaic rebate and further promotion of the use of solar energy.

I commend the report to you. It can be found on the www.aph.gov.au website at this link www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/environ/cities/report.htm where you will find not only the report but also transcripts of evidence and all of the submissions received.

I said at the outset that the state of our cities is the consequence of complacency. This meeting tonight shows we are awaking from our slumbers. We can working together reclaim our cities, for ourselves and for our children.


Tuesday, November 08, 2005

Whitlam Industry spins away..again (yawn)

There's a political joke in the USA that sooths or torments the Democrats and their continuing rage about the Al Gore election defeat (rage maintenance is not unique to the Australian left). In response to a rage attack Republicans comment 'look - yes its true the Republicans have the White House but don't forget the Democrats have the West Wing..." a reference to the popular but fantasy world political drama 'West Wing' with its political correctness giving a cyber fix to raging Dems and the left wing media. In Australia we could say ' yes the Liberals have the Lodge (or Kirribili House) but don't forget Labor have Gough Whitlam'.

The Whitlam industry hits its annual overdrive as the aging 'ragers' self flagellate linking the 1975 removal of Australia's most incompetent Federal government with any contemporary political issues offending the sensibilities of the inner city left. For Australian's November is a set piece of predictable headlines - Melbourne Cup, Gough's latest repetitive interview and Lest We Forget Remembrance Day.

November 11, 1975 thankfully slides away as a irrelevant memory to many Australians and is now thankfully to become a museum oddity. 'Interesting times' appears to link the anti-terror laws with Gough's removal. I declined my invitation to the MCA 'bipartisan' event below.


“Dissident Voices” SPECIAL EVENT 6.30pm Friday 11 November 2005
In association with the exhibition Interesting Times: Focus on contemporary Australian art, the MCA presents a unique twilight event by 3 of Australia’s most radical writers/performers Ania Walwicz, Amanda Stewart & Ruark Lewis, alongside composer-musician Rainer Linz. This bipartisan event will commemorate ‘The Dismissal’ of the Whitlam Government 30 years ago in 4 very different and unexpected ways. MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART, Level 6 Admission: $12/$10 concessions/$8 MCA Members and AmbassadorsBookings essential as drinks will be served on the rooftop terrace 02 9245 2484 or education@mca.com.au


Meanwhile Piers Akerman takes the blow torch to the rewriting of the Whitlam legacy and the Telegraph's editorial echoes the view of most Australians:

"We're still several days away from the anniversary but there are few tributaries of this most heavily-explored part of our history which have not been given (another) going-over.
Not with any new insights or revelations, no forgotten morsel casting new light on the subject. Instead, it plays like a tragi-comedy of manners, where the same players assume the same roles and go through the same ritualised head-shaking at the day democracy died."
Read more here


It's Time to forget myth of Whitlam
By PIERS AKERMAN
AS THIS Friday's 30th anniversary of the dismissal of Gough Whitlam's dismal government on November 11 draws closer, a claque of self-indulgent old farts are engaging in an orgiastic welter of Whitlamophilia that overlooks some major truths....

Clearly, the rage was only to be maintained until polling day.
And for the bulk of Australian voters it was, as, angrily, they voted decisively to dump Labor four weeks later on December 13, when Malcolm Fraser and the Coalition swept into office with 91 seats to Labor's 36. Some rage indeed.
Obviously, it was not the rage that geriatrics who danced the twist to Little Pattie singing Labor's campaign song in the 1972 It's Time election hoped for.
Once again, Labor's inner urban branches had lost the plot as surely as the Whitlam government had lost office.
Thirty years on, all the indications are many of the same people and their indignant younger incarnations are still wedded to the same utopian fantasies that mesmerised the Whitlamites as they wandered the political landscape seeking a messiah to rekindle Labor's phantom Light on the Hill.

Read more here.

Piers reminds us of the appalling Loans Affair where the Whitlam government sought petro funds from the Iraq's Ba'athist connections - conveniently overlooked by the Whitlam industry just as the nod and wink to Indonesia over the East Timor invasionasion is conveniently side stepped by the inner city politically correct. John Howard addressing this national embarrassment will surely be judged by historians as one of his great legacies as Australia's second longest serving Prime Minister.

Regular eCouncillor readers will be disappointed if I agreed fully and totally with Piers Akerman and rest assured I will only go so far down his conservative path. One of my political heroes Malcolm Fraser does not escape the Pier's heated magnifying glass:

'Mr Fraser didn't present a great alternative, he lacked courage and had to be urged to act against what was patently a poor government, but his opposition would have been regarded with contempt if it had not taken steps to restore stability. '

Conservatives are not in the Fraser fan club but Liberals such as myself are proud of his actions on November 1975 as well as his post election progressive agenda such as legislation introducing Aboriginal land rights in the Northern Territory and Australia's unconditional acceptance of thousand Vietnamese boat people. As Fraser recently lamented his one regret in life is the Liberal party emerging as the Conservative party. His view is that Menzies wanted to found a progressive Liberal party and not a Conservative party. A view supported by many including speeches made by Menzies himself.

.

Monday, November 07, 2005

Reform needed for post parliamentary jobs



The Sydney Morning Herald's Paul Sheehan explores the mess that has become the Carr/Iemma Labor government's vigorous embrace of Public Private Partnerships. Particularly so with the daily entanglements of the Cross City Tunnel and the black hole swallowing Joe Trippodi in Epping. Not that Joe is to blame - it seems the knives are out for the luckless Carl Scully or 'Snarl Cully' as he is tagged by local government Councillors who have dealt with his brusque manner over local roads issues across the state.

Whilst I am a strong supporter of PPP's and point out to critics that thus far any losses the CCT is making are being wholly born by the private partner. Those (mainly in the left) who say PPP's privatise profit and socialise the risk need only look at two spectacular failures that have cost the private partners big money whilst the public partner (the taxpayers) have been insulated from any losses. One off-shore is the Wimberley Stadium PPP that has caused Multiplex so much stockmarket pain. Another closer to home being the Flinder's Street Station upgrade in Melbourne that has been nothing but bad news for the Leightons Construction whilst the Victorian government rests protected from losses (but perhaps not the growing electoral anger). Even the collapse of the Lanecove Tunnel will cost no money to the public purse as the construction firm will be insured and is already offering appropriate compensation to those affected - inevitably including the governemnt.

PPPs bring forward major capital works projects that government's are either not in a position to finance or do not prioritise highly up the list. If the CCT was to be publicly financed I suspect that the Carr government would have shelved the expensive project in favour of upgraded hospitals and schools in key regional and outer suburban seats. (note PPP's are already building and running schools in NSW). I believe that to build the City's ambitious $2 billion light rail network we will have to consider PPP's at some financing and operational level.

Whilst PPPs have their critics it is not helped when government decision makers jump across the line and become players in the private part of the partnership. Perception is as important as fact in maintaining public confidence and former Premier BoB Carr joining Macquarie Bank as a well paid consultant does raise legitimate questions on probity and transparency. And yes I know the Liberals are also guilty of this employment trend. I support a one year moratorium for former Ministers and Premiers/Prime ministers being employed by the private sector in areas that have business interests in their former areas of responsibility. If for no other reason than to maintain public confidence in PPP's. It's not like they need the money straight away with generous retirement pensions (no longer applying to new MP's). If the 2007 State election delivers a hung parliament (with 6 or 7 independents) then I suspect this reform may well be forced upon the government of the day.


It's high time Nobody was given the boot
November 7, 2005
Down the road the Cross City Tunnel "toll" won't be $3.56, writes Paul Sheehan.


IN MY living room I have a statue of Bob Carr, about a metre tall, one of the caricatures by the Herald's John Shakespeare, some of which are in the Australian Museum in Canberra. Early one evening, the phone rang and on the other end was the unmistakable stentorian baritone of the real Bob Carr.
I mentioned that I was standing next to my statue of him. The then-premier, without missing a beat, replied, "I look forward to the day when everyone will have a statue of me in their living room."
Effigy would be more like it these days, if he were still in charge.
As much as I miss having Carr around, his sudden and unforeseen resignation announcement on July 27 this year - he would clean out his office and be gone from politics within six days - appears, in retrospect, to be an act of supernaturally good exit timing.
In the short space since his departure, plans for the construction and financing of a desalination plant in Sydney have been unveiled, revealing that the plant would add the equivalent of 53,000 new vehicles in greenhouse gas emissions annually and that the millionaires factory, Macquarie Bank, is looking for a piece of the action.
Then there is the grotesquerie of the Cross City Tunnel, which has opened up a chasm of credibility in public trust for the State Government and the tunnel's owners, a consortium led by a subsidiary of the Hong Kong conglomerate Hutchison Whampoa, by Deutsche Asset management, a subsidiary of Germany's Deutsche Bank, and Bilfinger Berger BOT, a German infrastructure group.
And on the subject of chasms, there is the Lane Cove Tunnel excavation.
Carr got out just in time. But all these infrastructure projects began on his watch. He has earned every right to make a buck in his post-political life, but there is something queasy about him so quickly becoming a well-paid consultant to Macquarie Bank. Especially now, when the whole nature of so-called public-private partnerships and the brave new world of privatising the public realm is beginning to smell like plutocracy to the taxpaying, toll-paying electorate.
The decision to make the Cross City Tunnel free for three weeks was not merely a sign of panic, not merely a public relations stunt, but an attempt by the owners to get some estimate from Planet Earth, rather than Pluto, about how much traffic this asset may ever generate. What this ad-hoc survey told them was that even as a toll-free expressway, only about 50,000 use the tunnel per day.
At least Carr won't have to answer the hard questions that have not yet even be put, let alone answered:
Did the contract for the Cross City Tunnel breach the Main Roads Act (1924), which requires the state to build roadways for public use, not close them for private gain?
Were details of the project leaked strategically to CrossCity Motorway Inc, as claimed by the former transport minister, Carl Scully?
Who in the NSW Government was responsible for signing this contract and endorsing the traffic projections which underpinned it?
If it was Scully, why is he still a minister in the NSW Government, given his previous misadventures with the railway system?
Does the Premier, Morris Iemma, regard the contract, with its commitments to close public roadways, as acceptable?
read more here


Sunday, November 06, 2005

Weekend Pics - AIDS Trust Food & Wine Fair Hyde Park

Last weekend's AIDS Trust Food & Wine Fair held in Hyde Park and sponsored by the City of Sydney was another great success. eCouncillor took the camera along...














Plenty of food from Sydney's finest food establishments. All food and time donated with stalls asked to supply 300 servings. The punters used pre-purchased coupons to pick up a great dish and some fine wines all for a great cause.













Fig Tree Avenue with stalls thankfully staggered this year after the previous crushes!













Never forgetting the tragedy that brings us all together to support those surviving with HIV AIDS in our community.














The Elizabeth Street lawns became a man made and natural art festival. Worthy of two uploads even if by mistake!!











Was the Cardinal home? The vista now opened by Clover's latest fig tree cull.




























The famous Achibald Fountain in the very centre of Hyde Park became a wonderful outdoor cafe experience on a very Sydney early summer day.




The AIDS Trust volunteers. Well done to you all!

















And the homeless of Hyde Park slept just out of sight and oblivious to the goings on.








.

Friday, November 04, 2005

Edmund Burke wrote:

Certainly…it ought to be the happiness and the glory of a representative to live in the strictest union, the closest correspondence, and the utmost unreserved communication with his constituents. Their wishes ought to have great weight with him; their opinions high respect; their business unremitted attention. It is his duty to sacrifice his repose, his pleasure, his satisfactions to theirs-and above all, and in all cases, to prefer their interests to his own. But his unbiased opinion, his mature judgement, his enlightenment and conscience, he ought not to sacrifice to you or to any man, or any set of living men. These he does not derive from your pleasure-no, nor from the law and the constitution. They are trust from Providence, for the abuse of which he is deeply answerable.
Your representative owes you not his industry only, but his judgement: and he betrays, instead of serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion.

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

East Sydney street closures


Council on Monday night dealt with many difficult issues from a controversial new Chicken shop application in the Rex building Kings Cross (deferred for more consideration but opposed by myself on behalf of 60 local residents) to the final design and tender for the Redfern Street upgrade. I blogged on the latter earlier and will update on the positive outcome another time.

But along with dozens of bouquets comes the occasional disgruntled constituent. Green Councillor Chris Harris has consistently driven political wedges into Clover Moore's local community support base by cleverly exploiting the opposition to some of the street closures in East Sydney. A Green that supports more fossil fuel burning cars on inner city streets seems a contradiction. The Greens clearly have an agenda to turn Bligh (now Sydney) into another Marrickville or Port Jackson with a long odds Green opening and see pulling their Green supporters away from Clover Moore as their only chance. Councillor Harris has already announced his Green candidacy for the seat in 2007 and is feverishly at work.

When I spoke on this issue on Monday night I commented that it must be the 100th time I have spoken about East Sydney traffic management. The future of street closures and traffic changes in East Sydney is a vexed and contentious issue. Linked with the emotion and anger about the secret Cross City Tunnel contract and related traffic changes the issue is another local political hot potato! Harris had moved the motion that 'Council resolves that the Lord Mayor intervene on behalf of residents and businesses in East Sydney to call on the RTA to re-open Bourke Street at William Street immediately.'

The debate that ensued reminded us that the trial closure of Bourke Street at William Street was a direct result of the Woolloomooloo community concerns regarding the RTA's proposed 'G' loop directing west bound William Street traffic seeking to enter the Eastern Distributor ramp on Bourke street around the block through residential streets of Woolloomooloo. This was unacceptable to the local residents. Four solutions were proposed. The one most favoured by residents, businesses and motorists was a right hand turn from William into Bourke Street (north) and direct entry to the ED ramp. However the RTA advised that this was only possible with the closure of Bourke Street south in order to maintain traffic flows and reduce waiting times at the lights. It also eliminated two pedestrian crossings thus improving road safety.

I attended the public meetings over the past two years to debate the options and they overwhelmingly endorsed this proposal. It was then implemented on a six month trial basis. Council subsequently resolved to monitor the current street closures and traffic activity for a six month period and to have the results assessed and reported back to Council for further consultation and implementation of a traffic management plan. A process nearly half completed.

I was lobbied by some to immediately reopen the Bourke Street trial closure. Something not in my power to deliver. I indicated I was open minded on the Harris motion and would hear the debate. That has since been misrepresented as my agreeing to support the Harris motion. I was also lobbied by local residents and businesses to support the trial closure. Respected planning expert and city Councillor John McInerney moved the following amendment which replaced the Harris motion:




Council Notes that:
(A) following consultation in response to overwhelming community opposition to “G-Loop” access to the Eastern Distributor around Palmer, Cathedral and Bourke Streets Woolloomooloo, the Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) proposed a trial closure of Bourke Street south of William Street to enable direct right-turn access to the Eastern Distributor from William Street;
(B) the Minister for PlanningÂ’s approval for the closure of Bourke Street south of William Street is for a trial only, with the RTA to monitor the change and undertake a formal review six months after the closure is implemented;
(C) the RTA and Council have commenced traffic studies to monitor the impacts of the Cross City Tunnel, including the Bourke Street closure; and
resolves to continue work with the RTA to assess the impact of all Cross City Tunnel traffic changes, including the Bourke Street closure, to achieve an equitable outcome for local residents and businesses that addresses traffic congestion and displaced traffic due to the Cross City Tunnel.



The motion explains the process adopted by Council after community participation. I supported the alternate motibecause believeive a trial is a trial and Council needs more facts to make informed and appropriate decisions. When I spoke on the motion I indicated that I approach this trial totally open minded and I am totally prepared to have Bourke Street re-opened if the information we collate indicates this is the right thing to do. However there are also strong advocates for retaining the closure.


As a Councillor on South Sydney City Council directly elected by the East Sydney community and having run a local retail business and lived in the suburb for several years I am well aware of the issues and emotions surrounding street closures. For many years residents and SCEGGS school campaigned for limited closures to protect the school and residential streets from the devastating impact of street prostitution and related kerb crawlers.

The member for Bligh and the local police commander at the time strongly backed our decision to close Forbes Street at St Peter's Lane and St Peter's Street. The benefits of that closure have been sustained and appreciated by local residents but continue to be strongly opposed by advocates of so called sex industry rights. Their hard left political agenda is at play on this issue as well.


The right time to determine the future traffic managementent in East Sydney is after the six month traffic study and when the CCT has bedded down and the William and Oxford Street upgrades are completed - for better of worse. Only then will we be in a position to make long term and logicdecisionsons. Until then knee-jerk changes in direction will only compound the confusion and problems.

Images top to bottom:
1. Concrete barriers at trial Bourke Street south closure.
2. From closure looking east on William - note red car making right turn into ED ramp lane a pedestrian safely crossing closed street.
3. Not all street closures were invented by Clover Moor - Riley Street closure at least 20 years old. Creates pleasant plaza.
4. Pedestrians on William street will have more enjoyable walk with wider footpaths and new trees.
5. Kerb side parking bays will be installed all along William Street to benefit local businesses.